|
lainey
|
 |
« on: April 06, 2008, 05:54:40 PM » |
|
Hi there
My little girl recently had her Spay surgery at our local vet’s and she was lucky enough to benefit from a new operation, called a “Laparoscopic Spay”.
I was so amazed at the results I wanted to share them with you all.
Traditionally, spay surgery involves making a large incision to access the organs inside. The new laparoscopic technique means that the surgical procedure can be accomplished through two small holes giving rise to the name ‘key hole’ surgery.
In veterinary surgery, “key hole’ surgery has only recently been introduced as a surgical method and only a small number of veterinary surgeons are performing these types of operations on a routine basis. Ours is currently the only one who performs this technique in Scotland.
Until recently, the traditional method of spaying has been to remove the entire reproductive tract (ovaries and uterus) through a large (10-15cm) incision into the abdomen.
Using the new laparoscopic method only the ovaries are removed and this is achieved through two small, 5mm holes.
These small holes are made through the skin and muscles into the body and a camera and long, slender, surgical instruments are introduced to perform the surgery inside the body with maximum precision and minimal invasion.
The advantages for the patient include, much less pain and discomfort, quicker healing time and a more rapid return to normal activity.
There is no difference in the effect of the two operations and both techniques will stop your Bichon from coming into season. What's more the uterine disease Pyometra is still avoided as ovaries are required to contract the disease.
Mitsy has only 2 very small holes and NO external stitches at all.
Here she is

Compared a traditional operation

As she had a less invasive procedure her recovery time was dramatically increased. She walked out of the recovery room and jumped up onto the row of seats where I was. That night she ate well and went out to potty and bark at the neighbour's cat as normal . The cost was about 75% more expensive but in my opinion well worth it.
I just wanted to share this new option with you all, perhaps it will not be available in your area yet but as with everything new the more it is requested the more commonplace it will become.
Whatever option you choose, my very best wishes for you both 
Lainey & Mitsy 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bluebell
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: April 06, 2008, 06:06:43 PM » |
|
Yes thank you for sharing this info with everyone Lainey. The more we hear and learn about this technique the more popular it may become. Same as Terri, my girls' incisions were no where near as large with their traditional spays as in your example pic. They all recovered well and in a few days were fine but I know that for humans laproscopy has made things go from a hospital stay to an out-patient affair. Interesting to say the least!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mazza
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: April 06, 2008, 06:19:01 PM » |
|
good post Lainey.......hope this surgery becomes standard practise
Marilyn
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
SusieL
NOVICE

Offline
Posts: 774
Bichon-Frise.ca
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: April 06, 2008, 10:32:44 PM » |
|
 Thank you for sharing the information Lainey. Anything we can do to ease our  babies medical experiences is important. I haven't had a chance to speak with my vet about whether this is available in the U.S. I would assume it is - if nothing else at the veterinary schools. It also warms my heart to hear from all of you here about the extra, extra care and concern for our little precious bundles. After so much lately about the mistreatment of animals - it gives me hope. Susie and her main man, Oliver
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Freedom (Sandie)
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: April 06, 2008, 10:56:30 PM » |
|
Gee, isn't that something??? Thanks for explaining. I always worry about the girls SO much more than the boys, and this will help make things easier on all of us! I'll be sure to ask about it for future reference. Even though I don't have, nor expect to have, a need for it for a LONG time, I want to ask about it. One of my cats had a spay last year by a vet who trained in England, and he did it through the side, rather than the 'bottom.' It is also much easier for the pet than the way our vets are trained here in the US; but the vet has to be trained and it is slower for the VET so they can't "do as many in one surgery session." That is what MY vet told me when I asked him about what the other vet did.  And the girl is not as likely to get the saggy belly with that method. Sigh.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Thanks for the siggy, Del!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ArtsyCourtneySue
NEWBIE
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 9
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: April 15, 2008, 03:14:11 PM » |
|
Thank you for this new info!!! Poor Marie was drowsy for a few days...had about 7 days with the cone on her head and was all drugged up post-surgery- It was just awful! Its nice to know that this new prcedure will be available 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mazza
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: April 17, 2008, 03:59:58 AM » |
|
Poppy is going on 5th may for spaying.......at Lainey's vets,yesterday, i spoke to my vet about it and he had no problem with me getting this procedure done at another surgery.After seeing Mitsy it was truly amazing...anything to eleviate pain in our wee ones.
Marilyn
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|